Criticism of the United States before the war to put some fire, but fire again! (U.S. hypocrisy iron-clad proof of democracy

 In 2003 the U.S. launched the Iraq war, the United States there are some dissenting voices began, especially in Hollywood's annual Academy Awards ceremony, a group of public anti-war left-wing artists statements. But soon overwhelmed the militant voice In 2003 anti-war voices in late April, the United States, who, To those urged readers to stop supporting anti-war artists. from his home state of Texas and be ashamed of. I did not expect a ripple, support Bush's sharp drop in sales followed the band members at the door was filled with garbage, and some even sent death threats to them. Though Bush himself later said in an interview on television, ;, but people still come and go against the voice, so that the band originally intended for the American tour fell through. this people. Susan? Sarandon has publicly criticized the Bush administration's bellicose policy is oil interests, not for U.S. national security. because of their bright colors against the war, many Americans their very offensive, no peace ever since the couple, after another campaign was the misfortune of being canceled. Robbins is indignation: anti-war and lost a big business in October 2002 year, Sean? Pan $ 56,000 personal contribution in the Bush Steve? Bin suddenly announced several months of anti-war because the words and deeds Pan, Pan starred in revocation of the film This phenomenon has seriously infringed upon freedom of expression, and the last century McCarthyism in the 50's white terror no different. in the Iraq war, U.S. media the use of advanced technology and equipment and the full support of the U.S. military, the war was a large scale reported size of the first U.S. cable news network, nor is it technologically advanced U.S. National Broadcasting Company (NBC), but everywhere permeated media adopt a more objective position of the ABC and the tendency of the anti-war stance, one-sided media, the government committed Pulitzer Prize, but only because he told the Iraqi TV interview, said people do argue that: indifferent to, no one for the record straight. It is said that the Iraq war is like a mouth, not out of the war on the Government's apparent decision to challenge a lot of mistakes. some U.S. experts also worry that, when the United States of fanning nationalist sentiment, the Democratic will be translated into will limit the freedom of opposition drowned. people's passion will be used by governments in order to pursue its imperial policies. They say, one-sided tendency of American society, on the one hand led to the Americans with their own exclusive color blind nationalism; On the other hand led to the United States in foreign policy mishandling of international affairs and thus undermine America's international credibility and legality. the United States has not always been defenders of democracy from the Bush administration announced plans to spread democracy in the Greater Middle East and free future, there will be public opinion back in history, that the United States has been committed to spreading democracy in the world. the most significant to the number of President Wilson, his promotion from the First World War began after the establishment of a democratic country must be allies, to ensure world peace . In fact, the publicity to promote democracy in the United States is the world's power is in creating an illusion. until shortly before the end of the Cold War, the United States to spread democracy is not the believers in the world. On the contrary, in the cold for a long period of time, the U.S. has been the majority of support authoritarian regimes in developing countries, do not hesitate to support some dictators suppress the democratic movement. In the 20th century, the Korean War in the early '50s, the United States supports South Korea's Syngman Rhee regime. Ironically, the Syngman Rhee government Many officials have had cooperation with the Japanese, even if not very popular in Korea. the United States, said soon after the war, in order to curb the communist south, which prefer the dictatorship of reliable, do not mess in the democratic .1960 Rhee is trying to establish a democratic regime ousted South Korea, General Park Chung-hee took over the United States to support the government, the Korean people's efforts to follow in vain. Later in 1979, the United States not only encouraged, General Chun Doo-hwan launched military coup, but also allows the use of South Korea Chun Doo-hwan 20 Army divisions (the force command had previously been an official from the United States) to suppress the student uprising in Kwangju in 1980. uprising is not over yet, hundreds of South Korean democracy fighters were executed. The event known as the collusion with North Korea. Later, the Reagan administration and pressure, so as Kim Chun reduced sentence. Korean War, the United States and other developing countries in Asia, Africa, a series of intervention, mainly to foster some United States toe the authoritarian government to replace the democratically elected government. In 1951, Arbenz in Guatemala left-wing leaders in the history of the largest number of votes is elected president, began a series of social reforms. his land reform policy of the United States is deeply worried about the company, Western Hemisphere, the U.S. government a loved by the people elected a government. the military coup, Guatemala fell into a chaos. some on the left and organized a guerrilla war, while the right-wing military government of the United States is relying on long-term support for their brutal suppression. Guatemala's civil war lasted four ten years, hundreds of thousands of deaths to calculate. American right-wing military equipment training heinous bloody means, to prevent rural residents to provide shelter to the guerrillas, who burned a large village, killing countless innocent local Mayan indigenous people. When President Clinton visited Guatemala in 1999 when Guatemala had long-term support of the right-wing American soldiers, the bloody suppression of acts of the local people an apology. 1946 to 1954, Ho Chi Minh led the Vietnamese people for eight years with the French occupiers of India Shina .1954 war on May 7, the Vietnamese victory at Dien Bien Phu the French occupying army, July 21 signed an agreement in Geneva, provides for 17 degrees north latitude as the boundary line of the north ruled by the Communist Party of Vietnam, South Ngo Dinh Diem regime by the US-backed rule .1955, the Ho Chi Minh suggested that both North and South Vietnam through the election of a new government, North-South reunification. the United States encouraged the requirements of Ngo Dinh Diem ignored the north, because we all know that the North Vietnamese leader Ho Chi Minh, Ngo Dinh Diem would lose. Therefore, the U.S. not in favor of the election. the United States is convinced that if South Vietnam became Communist world, then the whole of Southeast Asia will automatically follow. This is popular in Washington was the domino theory, which dominated U.S. foreign policy, leading to finding fault with the United States .1964 North Vietnamese war, the United States, The best excuse to use force in Vietnam. now truth: what damage the ship is not only intact, but the event is, known to the people. the United States to intervene to overthrow democratic governments in Latin America is another classic example occurred in Chile. Chilean President Salvador Allende in Chile, founder of the Socialist Party, is open to believers of Marxism. He won democratic elections in 1970 came to power, left-wing policies introduced. thus began the CIA covert operations to overthrow the elected government. Since 1972, the CIA's secret operation, Chile began large-scale social unrest, strikes and anti-government demonstrations one after another, and finally led the military coup in 1973 September 11 In 1973 (the memory of Chileans General Pinochet launched a coup, Allende was strong resistance in the Presidential Palace, and ultimately killed by the rebels. in the Pinochet regime, tens of thousands of Chileans disappeared for no reason. then people only have know, they all were killed. U.S. government and involved in a military coup in Chile is so profound, that General Pinochet was charged in the Some former U.S. government officials, public opinion and in some countries by the judicial system to trace, including former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger. In 1951, Iran's democratically elected prime minister, Mossad nationalization measures taken to include British Petroleum of the project, including some oil companies have reverted to the state. Britain's allies during World War II to find once the United States to discuss countermeasures. But the United States and Britain are worried that direct intervention into the Persian Gulf would provide a pretext for the Soviet Union, so there is no right to send troops. the United States sent Kermit the CIA go-getters? Roosevelt. This man is Theodore? Roosevelt's grandson, is very familiar with the Middle East. He went to Iran, the use of bribes and threats and other means to buy off some people, encouraging these people took to the streets led to a number of violent conflicts, people are both unpopular and weak Mossad. Ultimately, the Mossad was forced off the stage, and later was placed under house arrest for life. pro-American Shah personally in power, its authoritarian modernization after the 20th century led to the Islamic revolution 70 years. Cold War, the United States around the world to .20 century 50's, the Soviet Union and Eastern Group and Western Group of the Cold War the United States, the Eastern bloc in the image of democracy and justice prevailed, affected by a number of socialist thought in developing countries in Asia, Africa Democracy and Nationalism leaders have come to power through elections. This makes Americans are very worried that they hesitate to use various means to create unrest in these countries, and some military leaders took the opportunity to engage in a coup encouraged. through the coup the military are often some of these dictators, they Most of the implementation of individual or family rule. does not require the United States not only engage in democratic reform of these dictators, but also give them support. casually think can give Zaire, Indonesia, the Dominican Republic, Lebanon, Greece, Philippines, Taiwan , Thailand, Afghanistan and so on. the second half of 2002, the Bush administration launched an attack Youxiang Saddam Hussein's regime in Iraq, began having an affair with Iraq and international terrorism, and Bin Laden close. but could not find evidence that, in turn, by Iraq's possession of weapons of mass killing grounds of injury, asked the United Nations send verification. in the verification of no results, no United Nations Security Council resolution on this case, the United States in 2003 still Souchao weapons of mass injuries as an excuse to kill in Iraq launched a war to overthrow the Saddam regime. In fact, Saddam Hussein's regime to some extent the United States kidnapped American diplomats hostage. US-Iranian relations is almost broken. So, when the Iran-Iraq war began, Americans are actually standing on the Iraqi side. Western public opinion on the atrocities of Saddam Hussein's regime in Iraq, occasional reports, the U.S. Saddam Hussein's government knew the south of the northern Kurds and Shia Muslims use violence, including the use of chemical weapons and poison gas. But in order to support Iraq against Iran, the U.S. government adopted a laissez-faire attitude on the attitude of Saddam Hussein. When in 1982 of Iranians are pushing back, pushing the war in Iraq, the United States worried that there may be fanatical Islamic revolutionaries overthrew the Saddam regime and occupation of Iraq oil fields. U.S. President Ronald Reagan ordered the Department of Defense and the CIA provided Iraq, including U.S. spy satellite photos, including military intelligence, while providing enough weapons to Iraq, to ensure that Iraq does not lose this war. came to be regarded as an active advocate of the Iraq war, one of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, then Ronald Reagan was as a special envoy sent to Baghdad to inform Saddam Hussein and Iraq the U.S. government to the news of the resumption of diplomatic relations. Rumsfeld also conveyed to Saddam Hussein to help Iraq, Israeli Prime Minister Shamir to war with Iran a message. Subsequently, the United States re- Open Embassy in Baghdad, sent CIA agents and U.S. military officers to Iraq to help Iraq deal with war, the affairs In 1986 May, the U.S., also with two batches of anthrax to Iraq two batches of botulinum Higher Education Department. almost the same time, U.S. intelligence learned that Iraq is committed to the development of ballistic missiles. But this did not stop living the U.S. intelligence computer experts was sent to Iraq's missile development center. until Saddam Hussein started the war before the invasion of Kuwait, the United States has been to transfer advanced technology and equipment to Iraq and weapons as normal. U.S. exports to Iraq had developed engaged in the development of chemical and nuclear weapons. In fact, Saddam decided to launch before the war in Kuwait had also inquire about the American reaction. Saddam Hussein has met with U.S. Ambassador Appleton Lille? Glaspie, to test her attitude. The latter assured him that President Bush approved the sale to Iraq of about 70 million dollars worth of advanced data transmission equipment. Because of this, Saddam was secure enough to let the Iraqi army invaded Kuwait. then they turned to the United Nations Bush administration, has been authorized by the Security Council, the U.S. organization played a multinational force, launched a code-named the approval of the United States, see the United States such a response, the surprise is imaginable. When the multinational forces loyal to Saddam Hussein's Iraqi Republican Guard playing pieces, ready to lay Baghdad, President Bush has ordered to stop attack. In fact, Saddam Hussein that the United States was spared, because he also used to block possible Iranian forces westward. different. the ruling team in the Bush Administration have many people in the Bush administration have served, and then many of them in the first Gulf War to build on the progress claim, hit Baghdad and overthrow Saddam Hussein In Iraq, a moderate pro-American Arab governments. But their proposal was not accepted by the elder Bush, George HW Bush and his national security adviser, agreed that the international community has not authorized the United States do such a thing, or the stability of the Saddam regime The situation in the Middle East as a useful pawn. Bush came to power, overtaken by events, the situation very different. around a group of President Bush's neo-conservatives around the new century, the U.S. strategy has its own unique views, arguing that U.S. interests are dominate the world, and is undoubtedly the best means to dominate the global promotion of democracy and freedom in the name of the banner. For this reason, the promotion of democracy in the Middle East, Saddam Hussein must be removed. the United States chooses to implement in the Middle East in Iraq The goal is not accidental, because the regime of Saddam Hussein comply with a series of objective criteria: the implementation of family rule of Saddam Hussein in Iraq, the ruling means is extremely brutal, the people ruined. from the first Gulf War, the United Nations on Iraq a variety of sanctions, Iraq finally leaving only the oil for food and medicine to get the right weapons and equipment of its armed forces and are vulnerable against this power of the country easy. So, the Bush administration has deliberately shed news that Saddam Hussein regime because the hatred of the United States, and closely linked to international terrorist organizations; Iraq was still developing weapons of mass destruction in many, if Iraq's weapons of mass destruction to transfer to the Williams Field in 1983, as U.S. envoy visits Iraq, Saddam Hussein still had inquired in detail about what the Americans will help him In 2003 he became defense minister urged the U.S. government to immediately launch a unilateral attack, pull out as soon as possible Fengyun thorn out. Donald Rumsfeld declared that Iraq can be a violation of United Nations resolutions and the end of the verification of the Gulf War in 1991, attacked the agreement as a basis. The U.S. government asserted that, given the threat of too much, so the U.S. needs to fight a pre-emptive war. In order to meet the global scale to take such action against the voices and the United States firmly opposed the U.S. government asked the Council to adopt a resolution. Security Council voted unanimously adopted Resolution 1441, resolution calling for mass destruction, Saddam Hussein progress in the development of weapons storage sites and to provide complete information, while new to the United Nations weapons inspection team informed of the above, for verification. can be said that in the United Nations, other countries are to some extent to accommodate the United States, as long as it not insist on the use of force against Iraq. However, those within the Bush administration policy decision makers is to the war in Iraq to to prove that Iraq did not fully implement United Nations resolutions, but not enough evidence to take that criticism on Iraq, and it repeatedly asked the Security Council issued an ultimatum to Saddam. In order to find a compromise, to France and Germany Many countries, led by the United Nations put forward a request to increase the strength of the verification program, but these ended in the United States rejected. Thus, France has threatened that if the United States in the absence of sufficient evidence that Iraq violated UN resolutions to request the Council to poll France will veto. France is a permanent member of UN Security Council, veto it would mean the Council can not make a new resolution on Iraq, not an ultimatum to Saddam. The Bush administration has been seen in the Security Council was think of something less than himself, and he resolved to go it alone, despite the opposition of other countries, a separate war against Iraq. under the guise of freedom and democracy in the output of the expansion of American overseas expansion, the output is always the name of the banner of democracy and freedom and subvert the regime of another country is originator. In fact, before him, Theodore? Roosevelt has said the United States in the Western Hemisphere need to play this role. He took over the presidency after McKinley's speech, presented their views of the United States the world's responsibility . He said: , so the apparent inability to do bad things or management, although the United States reluctantly, but it will go to fulfill its international police power. Any non-democratic regime will be subject to U.S. sanctions. Shortly after Wilson's creed to be the practice in Mexico. In 1913, the overthrow of the Government of Mexico, Madero was assassinated Prime Minister, General Huerta seized power. Wilson did not accept This fact, determined to use force to restore order in Mexico, a move in European countries caused an uproar. In Britain, Foreign Secretary Grey summoned the U.S. ambassador to Britain, Peggy. two of the dialogue was described by many scholars of U.S. foreign policy reference, fully demonstrated in the use of force to restore American democracy on a foreign view. Gray: Do you armed intervention in Mexico it? Peggy: We will force them to the election, and force them to comply with election results. Gray: If they do not accept it? Peggy: We have to go back, let them vote again. Gray: If all this does to last two hundred years? Peggy: So we stay there for two hundred years, until they learn to the election, learn to manage their own. This section of the dialogue fully prepared to use force to show Americans abroad to force other countries in the implementation of democracy. With the end of World War I, Wilson introduced the use of force overseas, the idea of democracy has bigger stage, he wanted to build an international coalition global democratic forum, but because of opposition from the United States Senate, he aborted the idea. Why are you so keen on the U.S. overseas promotion of democracy? out of an idealistic belief in the name of communism, the Soviet Union as the slogan , want to use a model transformation of the world? historian Ferguson thought that the United States to force others to accept that American democracy is actually not his own invention, it is the practice of that year there are many similarities between the British . British also established that year had a global way to rule the world that the British territory. the United States to spread democracy abroad, it is to impose their own management control of it in overseas areas, it is need a U.S. style government. Marines to occupy the port of Veracruz in eastern Mexico and the oil pipeline, in order to prevent Germany from where the goods imported into Mexico. US-funded armed rebellion of small stocks continued to make trouble in Mexico, the U.S. oil companies refused to Huerta government tax. in the huge pressure, Huerta decided to resign, hand over power to the leader of the opposition Carranza. Two years later, General Pershing and the United States with troops crossed the Mexican border, is known to chase a people who bit 名叫比利亚, who was originally allies Carranza leader, but later became a traitor, led a group of armed guerrillas to the Carranza regime kept asking for trouble, but also killed some Americans. U.S. troops deep into Mexican territory, did not find David Villa is not careful hand in the fire with the Mexican regular army. Wilson worried about large-scale war broke out between the U.S. and Mexico will command General Pershing return after victory Hui Zhao. Carranza Although the presidency, but he was forced to accept the Mexican nationalist parliamentary representatives and union representatives argued that the Constitution adopted in 1917 to fully reflect these on behalf of the land ownership, natural resource management and the idea of labor and social legislation. At this time The United States began to worry about tension from the relationship. Two years later, Carranza army generals regardless of the opposition, we should push their own candidates up and down the next presidential throne, the results of the military armed rebellion Carranza in the way of escape was being sold kill. the United States in Latin America as its backyard, to spread democracy to intervene on behalf of many, but each time interventions seem to have special background, every time that the United States strategic interests in the competition. Thus, the U.S. military intervention not so case. When you see the hope of building the Panama Canal is about to fall when he sent President Wilson to support the U.S. Navy forces in the separatist rebellion in Panama. this The fighting for independence of Panama, and from it has been ten miles wide piece of land across Panama, and ultimately the construction of the Panama Canal. from the Panama Canal opened in 1914, the United States the right to operate the Panama Canal has been under control until 1999 was returned to Panama. the United States in its armed intervention in neighboring countries, many in Cuba, Haiti, the Caribbean islands, but are less successful, where consolidation of the democratic regime has never been a coup and civil war seems to be commonplace . historian Ferguson said the United States to use force to establish American-style in China and the U.S. government's attempt failed miserably, to 1939, where only one country can be regarded as democratic countries, it is Costa Rica, the United States never been there, armed intervention. But through the armed intervention, the United States have long claimed to establish its own hegemony in the Western Hemisphere. U.S. armed intervention in Central America to establish the most ridiculous example of democracy must go to Africa and Nicaragua. 20 years from the 20th century onwards, Nicaragua caught in an endless civil war. from 20 to 30 years late, the U.S. Navy repeatedly into Nicaragua to help the people there to organize elections, but the newly elected leaders tend to be short-lived .1932, the U.S. military was involved in a fight against the Sandinista guerrilla warfare school organization, the Sandinista guerrillas equipped with simple, running around in the mountains, although the U.S. military well-equipped, but can not find a few guerrillas. As the U.S. military constantly being ambushed, the U.S. public opinion to send troops to begin to discuss what is the meaning of Nicaragua. Finally, in early 1933, the U.S. Navy pulled out of Nicaragua. Since then, the Sandinista I came out from the mountains, but soon the National Guard was killed in Nicaragua, The decision to kill people is the Sandinista Nicaraguan Americans support it Somoza National Guard leaders. Somoza was elected president in 1936, deposed Sacasa and declared himself Family of Nicaragua for over two generations of dictatorship, three as president until 1979, this family's rule ended. on such a dictatorial rule of the family, the U.S. has made tolerance with. When Franklin? Roosevelt Somoza family that was intolerable bad, they can only criticize a raised. The article says: I put Haiti and Cuba into a Citibank kid who can collect the wealth of place, and I helped Wall Street robbed half a dozen Central American countries. extortion of the list is long. I in 1909 - 1912, help Brown Brother International Banking Corporation, purified Nicaragua, and I in 1916 for the benefit of the U.S. sugar industry brought to light the Dominican Republic, and I in 1903 for the American fruit companies in Honduras and to I think I can give Capone (Al Capone) some sort of inspiration. he up to three districts in the city engage in a point of extortion, and our naval activities are in three continents. Butler to blurt out in Latin America American armed intervention of the real purpose of all this interference but the name of In 1975, the United States started a study on the Trilateral Commission report, was responsible for shortage of resources will lead to political ...